Friday, December 30, 2005

Wines I Had in 2005 and Some Quick Notes/Comments

Besides the bottles mentioned in previous posting, I had the pleasure of opening up a group of some very fine bottles from my cellar for two Belgium friends who were visiting me this past Spring. France Lejeune, a contemporary art dealer friend, and her husband Digby Benn were both into wine. Digby is especially an enthusiast. He learned wines in South Africa and still gives me great tips on this up-and-coming region of viniculture.
A few of the wines as I recall them now nearly eight months after the fact:
Gosset Reserve Champagne: one of the most dependable champagnes (the regular bottling is pretty good as well and stands as my "house" champagne), 93 points.
1959 Margaux (this one I have had again quite recently): a marvelous bottle of wine that is ready today. Its beautiful perfume just climbs out of the glass. The taste in the mouth lasts a minute or more, but then who was focused enough to time it. 97+ points.
1983 Margaux: a solid bottle but the '59 Margaux does kind of kill it. 92 points.
1970 Beaulieu Vineyards George de Latour Private Reserve: still a very fine wine, but drink up. 92 points.
1985 Robert Mondavi Late Harvest Reserve Riesling: spectacular, balanced and very tasty. 95 points.
1952 La Tache DRC: superb bottle, great length and nose, but the 1978 does edge it a bit now. 93 points.
1978 La Tache DRC: what can I say? This is great stuff. I have had several bottles of it over the years and it has always be wonderful drinking. It could still keep, but why bother? The nose is amazing and the length goes on and on and one. Just like that dumb Energizer bunny. Give it 98+ points.
1982 Palmer: which is a very fine bottle, but the Margaux's both edge it, although the 1983 is a close one. 91 points.
I also drank a great 1985 Margaux, which appears to be drinking very well at the moment. 94 points.
Bonne Annee and Happy New Year to you all!

Tuesday, March 22, 2005

Two Virtually Perfect California Cabs

Well, today I toasted my mom, who recently passed away, and the mother of a good friend. I drank two bottles with the husband of this friend.
Here are our notes:
1991 Dominus. There should be no doubt to which Dominus is the finest vintage ever. It is the 1991 (yes, the 1994 was also excellent; but I have always prefered the 1991). Perfect today with a smoothness and low ph feel in the mouth. Great length and nose. I didn't know exactly how to match it up when we finished the bottle with ease.
Only Napanook could match it, so I opened a bottle of 1958 Inglenook Estate. What a miracle! Again low ph on the mouth. Butterscotch on nose and palate. A touch of flower honey on the aftertaste and just a hint of methol on the nose. Again, stunningly ready to drink.
Both wines are clearly at their peak. Could they last longer? Yes, but who really gives a damn, when they drink so amazingly well today.
Give them both perfect 100 points.

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

WINE NOTES: 2002 BURGUNDY TASTING AND OTHER RECENT BOTTLES

One of the better Burgundy producers, especially for the money, is Daniel Rion. According to early reports of the 2002 Burgundy vintage, this will be an erratic group of wines. Some producers frankly had problems from the 2003 heat wave, which hurt some of those who could not keep their cellars cool. But if Daniel Rion's wines are any indicator, some of the Burgundies from this vintage will be the best since 1995, or even 1990. They are loaded with fruit, with great length and balance. The tannins are there but in the better wines barely noticeable. The purity of Rion's top two wines is astonishing. The wines of Cote de Nuit reportedly did much better this year than the Cote de Beaune.

From a tasting of 2002 Daniel Rion Burgundies (the prices were for pre-arrival, so they might be a few more dollars on actual release):
Haut Cotes-Nuits-Blanc, Rating 86, decent clean and a great value for a "house" white wine ($12).
Cotes-Nuits-Villages, Rating 83, Smoky and simple, but quite drinkable and at $18 a decent, but not spectacular value.
Vosne Romanee, Rating 89, More candy and more complexity ($30).
Chambolle-Musigny Les Beaux Bruns, Rating 92, Nice balance and ph, good purity, the best value of the mid-price range ($32). I considered buying this one.
Nuit St. George Vielles Vignes, Rating 90, More reticent on the nose, more noticeable tannins, but very good ($32).
Vosne Romanee Les Beaux Monts, Rating 91-92+, Quite nice, big nose, very long in the mouth ($44).
Vosne Romanee Les Chaumes, Rating 91-92+, Very similar to the Beaux Monts, very long ($44).
Nuit St. George Haut Pruliers, Rating 92-93+, Very tasty and a definite step up in the tasting ($44). I bought this wine.
Nuits St. George Les Vignes Rondes, Rating 90, My least favorite of the bigger wines, but still excellent, just not as interesting as the other fine wines in this tasting ($44).
Echezeaux, Rating 93+, Beautiful purity and balance. Delicate not heavy, but a bit of tannin at the end, with good length. Meant for the long term. My second favorite wine of the tasting, and I bought this wine ($65).
Clos Vougeot, Rating 95, The very best wine of the tasting. Balance, fruit, great length in the mouth (this wine just goes on and on, like the Energizer Bunny), super nose—just wonderful overall. A solid, exciting wine that is even drinkable today or can easily be cellared for the longer term. I bought this wine ($75).

OTHER RECENT BOTTLES
1991 Pesquera Reserva. Pesquera is always a great value in good years, and 1991 was a very good year in Spain and for Pesquera (as was 1983, 1985, 1994 and 1999-2001, actually there were even some good 1995s and 1998s; Spain is much like California this way: most years are decent if not great). I have had great simple crianzas (about $20-25/bottle now for current vintages) and reserves (about $35-45/bottle) from this old Spanish house. I prefer to skip the very top of their offerings (Gran Reserva), which sometime get a bit too much wood for my taste and are just too pricey (close to $100/bottle) to justify the extra expense. The crianzas and reserves are the real "buy" here. The wines almost always seem to drink well after about 12-15 years. Four years ago, I had a 1985 crianza that was still drinking very well indeed (Rating 91), even with a leaking cork. The 1991 reserva is drinking extremely well right now but still has plenty of stuffing left to cellar for at least another 10+ years. I have often found leaking corks from Pesquera for some reason (probably shipping, but possibly bad corks), but astonishingly the wines do not seem to have suffered from it. This one is lovely, with just the right touch of acid to make it interesting, but a low ph mouth feel with lots of fruit. A big wine, make no mistake about it, but its concentration adds to the interest. The nose floats from the glass with just a whiff of eucalyptus, but dark fruits as well. Oddly the nose closes down a bit as time goes on, perhaps indicating a future time where the wine may close down again. Unlike some Spanish wines, this one seems to have the fruit to go the distance. But why wait when it is drinking so well now. Good purity and length. Rating 94 and an excellent buy.